Hamilton v. Oklahoma City University
District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
TIMOTHY D. DeGIUSTI, District Judge.
Before the Court is the motion for summary judgment [Doc. No. 34] of Defendant Oklahoma City University (“OCU”). Plaintiff timely responded, and OCU filed a reply. OCU seeks judgment on all claims asserted by Plaintiff, arguing that the undisputed material facts establish it is entitled to judgment as a matter of law in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P. 56. Background:
Plaintiff asserts claims resulting from OCU’s failure to select her for the position of director of forensics and assistant professor of rhetoric, a full time, tenure-track faculty position.…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Boydston v. Mercy Hospital Ardmore IncDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 2020
- Cooks v. Renaissance Waterford Hotel Oklahoma CityDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 2025
- Cronkite v. Oklahoma Attorney GeneralDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 2022
- George v. Community Health Centers IncDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 2022
- Mitchell v. Clean Harbors Environmental Services IncDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 2023
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.