Legal Opinion

Hamilton v. Oklahoma City University

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma

Decided November 28, 2012No. CIV-10-1254-DPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

TIMOTHY D. DeGIUSTI, District Judge.

Before the Court is the motion for summary judgment [Doc. No. 34] of Defendant Oklahoma City University (“OCU”). Plaintiff timely responded, and OCU filed a reply. OCU seeks judgment on all claims asserted by Plaintiff, arguing that the undisputed material facts establish it is entitled to judgment as a matter of law in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P. 56. Background:

Plaintiff asserts claims resulting from OCU’s failure to select her for the position of director of forensics and assistant professor of rhetoric, a full time, tenure-track faculty position.…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Boydston v. Mercy Hospital Ardmore IncDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 2020
  2. Cooks v. Renaissance Waterford Hotel Oklahoma CityDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 2025
  3. Cronkite v. Oklahoma Attorney GeneralDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 2022
  4. George v. Community Health Centers IncDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 2022
  5. Mitchell v. Clean Harbors Environmental Services IncDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 2023

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API