Legal Opinion

Strong v. Commonwealth

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 22, 1983No. Appeal, No. 2300 C.D. 1981PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Rogers,

The Office of Employment Security, a referee and the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review all denied benefits to the appellant, Clarence Strong, because, as they concluded, his unemployment was caused by his willful misconduct. Section 402(e) of the Unemployment Compensation Law, Act of December 5, 1936, Second Ex. Sess., P.L. (1937) 2897, as amended, 43 P.S. §802(e).

The claimant was employed as a coal mine examiner. In April, 1981, the United Mine Workers were on strike, the employer’s mine was idled and as a consequence the claimant and other mine examiners had…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Nesmith v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  2. Costa v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  3. Bala v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Kennedy's Piggly Wiggly Stores, Inc. v. CooperCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1992
  2. Cundiff v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  3. Carroll v. Board of ReviewAppellate Court of Illinois · 1985
  4. Carpenter v. Iowa Department of Job ServiceCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 1986
  5. B.A. Dietrich v. UCBRCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2015

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API