People v. Sheek
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HOLLENHORST, Acting P. J.
The People contend that the trial court lacked jurisdiction to grant defendant’s Penal Code 1 section 2966, subdivision (b), petition on the ground of insufficiency of evidence without conducting a jury trial and erred as a matter of law in granting the petition.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
Petitioner filed a petition under section 2966, subdivision (b) challenging the Board of Prison Terms’ certification that he met all six criteria for commitment for treatment as a condition of parole under the Mentally Disordered Offender Act (MDO Act, § 2960 et seq.).…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- People v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1997
- People v. Superior Court (Ghilotti)California Supreme Court · 2002
- People v. ClarkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
- Clemens v. American Warranty Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1987
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- People v. StevensCalifornia Supreme Court · 2015
- People v. Bendovid, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- May v. HunterDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2006
- People v. BendovidCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2018
- People v. BrandonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.