Schoenhaus v. Genesco, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
POLLAK, District Judge.
Plaintiffs Harold Schoenhaus and Richard M. Jay have filed suit against Genes-co and Johnston & Murphy (collectively referred to as “Genesco”). 1 Count I claims infringement of plaintiffs’ patent for an orthotic device designed to prevent hyperpronation of the foot; Count II alleges misappropriation of trade secrets; Count III alleges conversion; and Count IV alleges unjust enrichment. Taken collectively, Counts II, III, and IV charge misappropriation, and impermissible exploitation, of the trade secrets allegedly embodied in plaintiffs’ patent.
Currently before…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Vitronics Corporation v. Conceptronic, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- Barmag Barmer Maschinenfabrik Ag v. Murata MacHinery Ltd., and Murata of America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- amazon.com, Inc. v. barnesandnoble.com, Inc. And barnesandnoble.com, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Schoenhaus v. Genesco, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006