Legal Opinion
Schoenhaus v. Genesco, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided March 15, 2006No. 2005-1278PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MICHEL, Chief Judge.
Plaintiffs Harold D. Schoenhaus and Richard M. Jay appeal the decision of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania granting summary judgment of non-infringement of their United States Patent No. 5,174,052 (“the ’052 patent”) to defendants Genesco, Inc. and Johnston & Murphy, Inc. Schoenhaus v. Genesco, Inc., 351 F.Supp.2d 320 (E.D.Pa.2005). The district court correctly held that the limitations of claim 1 must be found in a removable orthotic insert, or the immovable insert portion of a shoe, and may not be provided by other parts of the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Warner-Jenkinson Co. v. Hilton Davis Chemical Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Cybor Corporation v. Fas Technologies, Inc., and Fastar Ltd., Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Unique Concepts, Inc., and Floyd M. Baslow v. Kevin Brown D/B/A Creative Walls, Templar and Schram, and World Plastics Extruders, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
- Irdeto Access, Inc. v. Echostar Satellite Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Becton, Dickinson & Co. v. Tyco Healthcare Group, LPCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
- TIP Systems, LLC v. Phillips & Brooks/Gladwin, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
- SkinMedica, Inc. v. Histogen Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2012
- LG Electronics U.S.A., Inc. v. Whirlpool Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 2011
- Tecsec, Inc. v. International Business MacHines Corp.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2011
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.