Legal Opinion
Aikens v. District of Columbia Department of Housing & Community Development
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided October 3, 1986No. 84-885PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PRYOR, Chief Judge:
In this case, the District of Columbia Department of Housing and Community Development (DHCD) terminated petitioner Franklyn E. Aikens’ benefits under the Section 8 Housing Assistance Payments Program — Existing Housing (Section 8) after he failed to provide the agency with bank records during its annual recertification of his income. On appeal, petitioner asserts first that termination of his benefits was unlawful because DHCD failed to follow procedures for income verification outlined in applicable federal regulations and criteria. Second, petitioner argues that DHCD’s…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Mrs. Lola Hornsby v. Ivan Allen, Mayor of the City of AtlantaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1964
- James Holmes v. New York City Housing AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
- Thelma Joy, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. Holland Daniels, ChairmanCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1973
- White v. RoughtonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1976
- Geneva Towers Tenants Organization v. Federated Mortgage InvestorsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Lightfoot v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2005
- Lightfoot v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2004
- Powell v. District of Columbia Housing AuthorityDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2003
- Webb v. District of Columbia Department of Human ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
- Aikens v. District of Columbia Department of Housing & Community DevelopmentDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986