Legal Opinion
Gissen v. Tackman
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided May 28, 1975No. Civ. A. 75-522PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WHIPPLE, Chief Judge.
This matter is before the Court on defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint, or, in the alternative, for summary judgment. The plaintiff alleges discriminatory conduct on the part of the defendants, all of whom are officials of the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development, (HUD), and he seeks both compensatory and punitive damages. It is contended that the defendants, in their capacity as employees of HUD, transferred the plaintiff from one regional office to another based solely on the fact that he is both Caucasian and a member of the Jewish…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Commissioner v. SunnenSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Cromwell v. County of SacSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Baltimore Steamship Co. v. PhillipsSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Fred Engelhardt, D/B/A Engelhardt's Camera Store v. Bell & Howell Co., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1964
- Smith v. McNealSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- The Lubrizol Corporation v. Exxon Corporation and Exxon Research and Engineering CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
- Culver v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1989
- United States v. Athlone Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
- Adams v. American Bar AssociationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1975
- Annapolis Urban Renewal Authority v. Interlink, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1979
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.