Legal Opinion

Potter v. Washington County, Fla.

District Court, N.D. Florida

Decided July 11, 1986No. 86-2065, 86-2071PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

VINSON, District Judge.

The plaintiffs have filed these actions, which are consolidated for the purpose of this order, alleging that the current at-large election system employed in Washington County for the purpose of electing county commissioners and county school board members violates the Voting Rights Act of 1965 (“Voting Rights Act”), Title 42, United States Code, Section 1973, et seq., as amended. Specifically, the plaintiffs claim that the at-large system of electing county-wide officials in Washington County impermissibly dilutes the voting strength of black individuals which, in…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Reynolds v. SimsSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Thornburg v. GinglesSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. City of Mobile v. BoldenSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Whitcomb v. ChavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Rogers v. LodgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1982

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Warren v. City of TampaDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 1988
  2. East Jefferson Coalition for Leadership & Development v. Parish of JeffersonDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1988
  3. Volma Overton, and Ernesto Calderon, Plaintiffs-Intervenors-Appellants v. City of Austin, and Black Citizens Task Force, Defendant-Intervenor-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989
  4. Volma Overton, and Ernesto Calderon, Plaintiffs-Intervenors-Appellants v. City of Austin, and Black Citizens Task Force, Defendant-Intervenor-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API