SEC. & Exch. Comm'n v. Kokesh
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
HARTZ, Circuit Judge.
This case returns to us after reversal and remand from the United States Supreme Court. The Supreme Court held that the claims for disgorgement against Defendant Charles Kokesh brought by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) were subject to the five-year limitations period in 28 U.S.C. § 2462 . The SEC contends that $5,004,773 was converted within this period and must be disgorged. Mr. Kokesh contends that the SEC's causes of action first accrued more than five years before it filed its claim. We agree with the SEC because the SEC's claims accrued separately for…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Havens Realty Corp. v. ColemanSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Shomo v. City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
- Kokesh v. Sec. & Exch. Comm'nSupreme Court of the United States · 2017
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- HEAL Utah v. PacifiCorpDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2019
- Clint Raymond Webb v. State of Wyoming, Ex Rel. Department of Family Services, Child Support Enforcement Division and Julie Alia WebbWyoming Supreme Court · 2020
- Chavez v. Centurion, LLCDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2025
- SEC v. KokeshCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2019
- SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. MELTONDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2025
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.