Legal Opinion
Ostby v. Oxnard Union High
District Court, C.D. California
Decided June 11, 2002No. CV01-8372AHMVBKXPublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS
MATZ, District Judge.
I
INTRODUCTION
This case involves solely a claim for attorney’s fees and costs under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (“IDEA”), 20 U.S.C. § 1400, et seq. Defendant Oxnard Union High has moved for judgment on the pleadings. Having considered the papers submitted and the file in the case, the Court has determined that this matter is suitable for submission to the Court without oral argument. See Local Rule 7-15; Fed.R.Civ.P. 78. For the reasons stated herein, Defendant’s motion is DENIED.
II
FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS
On…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Wilson v. GarciaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Buckhannon Board & Care Home, Inc. v. West Virginia Dept. of Health and Human ResourcesSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Farrar v. HobbySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Scott Fischer v. sjb-p.d. Inc., a California Corporation, Dba Cedar Creek Inn Svenja Bienlefeld Michael ViliunasCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- T.D. v. Lagrange School District No. 102Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
- Kaseman v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2004
- Wilson v. Government of District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2010
- Meridian Joint School District No. 2 v. D.A.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- Noyes v. Grossmont Union High School DistrictDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2004
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.