Legal Opinion

Ex parte Kazan

District Court, S.D. Texas

Decided May 2, 1925No. 312PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUTCHESON, District Judge.

Respondent in his answer to the writ justifies the detention of relators on the ground that they axe aliens held in deportation proceedings, and asserts that not the relators, but the writ, should be discharged because issued prematurely; there being not only no order for deportation entered, but no hearing as yet had.

Relators reply, making the contention very seriously that the immigration authorities are without jurisdiction to detain them for that they are citizens, being children of a naturalized citizen and having entered the United States while yet minors, and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Ng Fung Ho v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  2. Kaplan v. TodSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  3. Zartarian v. BillingsSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
  4. United States ex rel. Patton v. TodCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1924
  5. Howe v. United States ex rel. SavitskyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1917

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Schneider v. United States Immigration & Naturalization ServiceDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1946
  2. United States ex rel. Garos v. ReimerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1938
  3. United States ex rel. Gonzalez v. KirkDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1930
  4. (PC) Mann v. GarciaDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API