Legal Opinion

Mohundro v. Board of Sup'rs.

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided January 13, 1936No. 32002PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAnderson, J.

Appellants, who under the authority of chapter 171, Laws 1934, were engaged in the sale of beer and light wines in Tippah county, undertook to prosecute an appeal by certiorari from an order of the board of supervisors of the county, providing for an election by the qualified electors of the county to determine whether such sales should be abolished. The election was held, resulting in the abolition of such sales. On motion of appellee the circuit court quashed the writ of certiorari and entered a judgment dismissing the cause. From that judgment appellants prosecute this appeal.

In the early…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. GarrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  2. Ferguson v. Board of SupervisorsMississippi Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Power v. RobertsonMississippi Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Corbett v. DuncanMississippi Supreme Court · 1885
  5. A. Loeb & Co. v. DuncanMississippi Supreme Court · 1885

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Adams v. Board of Sup'rsMississippi Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Board of Supervisors v. McCormickMississippi Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Coleman v. Board of SupervisorsMississippi Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Costas v. Board of Sup'rsMississippi Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Town of Terry v. SmithMississippi Supreme Court · 2010

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API