Legal Opinion

Adams v. Secor

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 15, 1870PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error from Leavenworth District Court. Action to vacate and set aside a judgment, and a sale and conveyance of lands. On the 3d day of March, 1864, the defendant in error, Zeno Secor, filed his petition, alleging that a certain judgment rendered by the Leavenworth District Court, on the 16th of February, 1860, in an action then pending in said court, brought by Theophilus Adams and Asa Maddox, as partners, against “ Ewing Denman &.Co.,” “ Taylor, Shelby & Co.,” George N.…

Read the full summary

Error from Leavenworth District Court. Action to vacate and set aside a judgment, and a sale and conveyance of lands. On the 3d day of March, 1864, the defendant in error, Zeno Secor, filed his petition, alleging that a certain judgment rendered by the Leavenworth District Court, on the 16th of February, 1860, in an action then pending in said court, brought by Theophilus Adams and Asa Maddox, as partners, against “ Ewing Denman &.Co.,” “ Taylor, Shelby & Co.,” George N. Sanders, Charles A. Secor, and Zeno Secor, was fraudulent and void as to the said Zeno Secor. The petition sets forth in…

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court:

The order overruling the demurrer, and the judgment of the district court, are affirmed.

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Dunlap v. SteereCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Richardson v. HowardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  3. DeSota Coal Min. & Dev. Co. v. HillSupreme Court of Alabama · 1915
  4. Prideaux v. PrideauxSupreme Court of Kansas · 1950
  5. Wagner v. BeadleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1910

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API