Legal Opinion
Carrillo v. Compusys, Inc.
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided December 9, 1996No. 17101PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BOSSON, Judge.
1. On this appeal from a denial of benefits to Worker, we must decide whether the Director of the Workers’ Compensation Administration (WCA) had the statutory and constitutional authority to appoint a Workers’ Compensation Judge pro tempore (WCJ pro tem) to hear Worker’s case. We are satisfied that the legislature has conferred such authority upon the Director in a manner which does not offend the New Mexico Constitution. Accordingly, we affirm.
2. Worker is presently employed with the WCA as an ombudsman. She was previously employed with Compusys, Incorporated (Employer).…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Matter of Adoption of DoeNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1984
- Woolwine v. Furr's, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1987
- State Ex Rel. Hovey Concrete Products Co. v. MechemNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1957
- Newsome v. FarerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1985
- Maples v. StateNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1990
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Dee Enterprises v. Industrial Claim Appeals OfficeColorado Court of Appeals · 2003
- Carrillo v. Compusys, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2002
- Treloar v. County of ChavesNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2001
- Chavez v. State Workers' Compensation Admin.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2012
- Pena v. StateNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2025