Legal Opinion

Shores v. Murphy

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided May 9, 1956PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

88 So.2d 294 (1956)

H.H. SHORES and H.G. Shores, Appellants,

v.

Ida MURPHY and her husband, R.H. Murphy, Appellees.

Supreme Court of Florida, En Banc.

May 9, 1956.

Rehearing Denied May 25, 1956.

A.G. Campbell, Jr., De Funiak Springs, for appellants.

James N. Daniel, Chipley, for appellees.

THORNAL, Justice.

Appellants Shores, who were defendants below, seek reversal of an adverse judgment entered in favor of appellees Murphy, who were plaintiffs below in an ejectment proceeding.

The issue on appeal is whether the trial judge committed error in ordering a jury trial despite the fact that neither party…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Roth v. HyerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1944
  2. Messana v. Maule IndustriesSupreme Court of Florida · 1951
  3. Boyer v. DyeSupreme Court of Florida · 1951
  4. Wood v. WarrinerSupreme Court of Florida · 1953

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. R. E. W. Construction Co. v. District Court of the Third Judicial DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Ohio Cas. Group v. ParrishSupreme Court of Florida · 1977
  3. In Re Amendments to Fla. Rules Civ. Proc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1992
  4. Flagship Nat. Bank of Miami v. TestaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
  5. In Re the Florida BarSupreme Court of Florida · 1972

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API