Legal Opinion
Messana v. Maule Industries
Supreme Court of Florida
Decided February 20, 1951PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
50 So.2d 874 (1951)
MESSANA
v.
MAULE INDUSTRIES, Inc.
Supreme Court of Florida, en Banc.
February 20, 1951.
Watkins & Cohen, Tallahassee, and Katz, Fuller & Culbreath, Miami, for appellant.
Blackwell, Walker & Gray, Miami, for appellee.
ADAMS, Justice.
The lower court sustained a motion to dismiss an amended complaint and entered judgment for defendant. Plaintiff appealed and the first matter for our consideration is the legal sufficiency of the complaint. Its charging part reads:
"Since on or around the 20th day of December, 1949, the plaintiff has been and still is the lessee of ten (10) acres of…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Kasanof v. Embry-Riddle Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1946
3Cited by29 opinions
- Arkin Construction Company v. SimpkinsSupreme Court of Florida · 1957
- Southern Bell Tel. & Tel. Co. v. McCookSupreme Court of Florida · 1977
- Pruitt v. BrockDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
- Kutner v. KalishDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1965
- Barrett v. City of MargateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.