Legal Opinion

Young v. La Rue

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 12, 1915No. 7081PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error from County Court, Blaine County; Ed. Baker. Judge. Action by S. E. La Rue against Maria Young. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtKane, C. J.

This cause comes *on to be heard upon a motion to dismiss, upon the ground that “at the time said action was commenced for said appeal the said defendant in error was dead, and the action had not been revived within one year from the time it could have first been revived, and that by reason of the said failure to revive said action the Supreme Court has no jurisdiction over the subject-matter involved therein on said pretended appeal.”

The motion to dismiss is not resisted. Counsel for defendant in error cite the following authorities in support of their contention: St. L. & S. F. R. Co. v.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Kilgore v. YarnellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  2. Skillern v. JamesonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  3. St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. NelsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. City of Anadarko v. McKeeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  2. Nichols v. BeardsleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API