Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

United States v. Mathis

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided August 18, 1967No. 17,533Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partQuinn, Chief Judge

(concurring in part and dissenting in part) :

My views as to the instruction on credibility of witnesses are set out in my dissent in United States v Schoenberg, 17 USCMA 145, 37 CMR 409. I adhere to them; and disagree with the majority’s conclusion that in the circumstances of this case they were prejudicial.

I also disagree with the majority as to the omission of an instruction on good character. The killing was conceded. In his own testimony, the accused .admitted he repeatedly stabbed the victim with a knife; he admitted he went approximately ninety feet to get a rock, which he used to…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. JonesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1957
  2. United States v. JohnsonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1953
  3. United States v. WeemsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1953
  4. United States v. DodgeUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1953
  5. United States v. PolakUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1958

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API