Legal Opinion

Eaton v. Prior, Belmay and Vermont State Police

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided July 27, 2012No. 2011-276PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSkoglund, J.

¶ 1. Kayla Eaton’s lawsuit against her former employer and supervisor for sexual assault was dismissed for failure to prosecute. She claims that her ability to prosecute the case was thwarted by a licensed polygraph examiner, Leroy Prior, who determined that she did not tell the truth in responding to questions about the alleged assault. Ms. Eaton and her father Robert Eaton filed this action against Prior, claiming negligent administration of the polygraph examination, and against the Vermont State Police and Lt. Matthew Bellmay, alleging that they improperly disclosed the examination…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Bull v. Pinkham Engineering Assocs., Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2000
  2. Lillicrap v. MartinSupreme Court of Vermont · 1991
  3. Sabia v. StateSupreme Court of Vermont · 1995
  4. Fitzgerald v. CongletonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1990
  5. Lamell Lumber Corp. v. Newstress International, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2007

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ernst v. KauffmanDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 2014
  2. Lewis B. Sykes, Jr. v. RBS Citizens, N.A., et al.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 2015
  3. Jenkins v. MillerDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 2025
  4. Molleur v. BucknamVermont Superior Court · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API