Legal Opinion

Rahn v. Searchlight Mercantile Co.

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided September 12, 1935No. 3111Published

1Opinion of the Court

*291OPINION

By the Court,

DUCKER, C. J.:

The Searchlight Mercantile Company, a corporation, instituted this action for unlawful detainer. The defendants employed as their attorney in the litigation one W. H. Metson, an attorney having offices in San Francisco, Calif. Later they also employed in the litigation Guy E. Baker' H. M. Morse, and C. D. Breeze, attorneys resident in the judicial district. Metson had charge of the defense.

On November 29, 1933, defendants, through attorneys Baker & Breeze, instituted removal proceedings and the case was removed to the district court of the United *292States for…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Harshey v. BlackmarrSupreme Court of Iowa · 1866
  2. Collier v. FalkSupreme Court of Alabama · 1880
  3. Kramer v. GerlachAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1899
  4. Stanton-Thompson Co. v. CraneNevada Supreme Court · 1897
  5. McNeal v. GossardSupreme Court of Kansas · 1903

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API