Legal Opinion

Brentner v. C. M. & St. P. R. Co.

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided June 10, 1882PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Cerro Gordo Circuit Court. Action to recover double damages for certain cattle alleged to have been killed by one of the defendant’s trains where it bad a right to fence. There was a trial to a jury, and a verdict and judgment were rendered for tlie plaintiff. The defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtAdams, J.

1. RAILROADS: injury to stock: fences: evidence. I. The defendant introduced as a witness one Eandall, and offered to show by him what was the character an<^ of fence, wdiere it was claimed that the plaintiff’s cattle escaped from the enclosure and ^ent upon the defendant’s right of way. The *626plaintiff objected, unless it was shown to be at the time of the injury or a reasonable time before it. The court sustained the objection, and the defendant excepted.

The material-inquiry of course was as to the condition of the fence at the time of the injury. Evidence of its condition at a subsequent…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Aylesworth v. Chicago, R. I. & P. R. R.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1870
  2. McNaught v. C. & N. W. R. R.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1870
  3. Atwell v. GrantCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1857

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. St. Louis & S. F. R. Co. v. HartSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  2. Kansas City, Memphis & Birmingham Railroad v. SpencerMississippi Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Wirstlin v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1904
  4. Daily v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1903
  5. Harper v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API