Legal Opinion
Jamil v. Village of Scarsdale Planning Board
New York Supreme Court
Decided June 8, 2004PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Thomas A. Dickerson, J.
Assisted Living Comes to Scarsdale
The CPLR Article 78 Petition1
Petitioners’ latest2 CPLR article 78 petition seeks to nullify certain findings and approvals made by the respondent, the Village of Scarsdale Planning Board, that would allow the respondent, Realm, L.L.C., to construct an assisted living facility (ALF) near the petitioners’ home in an area zoned for residential use. A final environmental impact statement was accepted in April 2002 and a findings statement was adopted by the Planning Board on May 22, 2002. The Planning Board approved the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Jackson v. New York State Urban Development Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Scherbyn v. Wayne-Finger Lakes Board of Cooperative Educational ServicesNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
- Akpan v. KochNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
- Gernatt Asphalt Products, Inc. v. Town of SardiniaNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
- New York State Ass'n of Counties v. AxelrodNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Matter of Marsha Jamil v. Village of Scarsdale Planning Bd.New York Supreme Court, Westchester County · 2004