Legal Opinion

Jones v. Vennerberg

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided July 6, 1937No. 30039PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGood, J.

This is an action for foreclosure of a real estate mortgage. In her petition plaintiff alleged, as required by statute, that no proceedings at law had been had for collection of the debt. Defendants denied that there was anything due upon the mortgage, and also denied the allegation that there had been no proceedings at law for collection of the debt. Trial of the issues resulted in a decree for defendants. Plaintiff has appealed.

The record reflects the following facts: March 2, 1925, defendants executed a promissory note for $7,000, due ten years after date, payable to one Frank Elming. This…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Asmus v. LongeneckerNebraska Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Beebe v. BahrNebraska Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Reed v. GoodNebraska Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Great Western Commission Co. v. SchmeeckleNebraska Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Young v. ThompsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1926

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Gasper v. MazurNebraska Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Thielen v. ThielenHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API