Legal Opinion

Sitek v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided October 8, 1997No. 96-01039PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

In this appeal filed pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), we agree with the appellant’s argument that the public defender’s lien in the amount of $150 must be reversed. See In re Anders Briefs, 581 So.2d 149 (Fla. 1991) (defense counsel may raise various sentencing issues while raising them in context of Anders). With respect to the laboratory fee payable to the Florida Department of Law Enforcement, however, we affirm its imposition as the product of a written plea agreement. Therefore, the appellant’s judgment and sentence is affirmed…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. In Re Anders BriefsSupreme Court of Florida · 1991
  3. Bourque v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
  4. Trice v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
  5. Stone v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Dale L. Allen v. State of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015
  2. Hardesty v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API