Legal Opinion
Max L. Wells Trust v. Grand Central Sauna & Hot Tub Co.
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided August 26, 1991No. 25611-4-IPublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGrosse, C.J.
Grand Central Sauna and Hot Tub Company of Seattle and David Stadtner, Arthur Bruschera, Harold Lipset, and Arthur Norack (Grand Central), appeal the money judgment entered in favor of the Max L. Wells Trust.
Grand Central was a tenant in a building owned by Max and Margaret Wells. The lease was negotiated by Max Wells and signed by him and his wife. Max Wells died during the term of the lease. Upon Mr. Wells' death, the property became part of the corpus of the Max L. Wells Trust (Trust). Eight years into the 10-year lease, business at Grand Central diminished considerably and other costs of…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Berg v. HudesmanWashington Supreme Court · 1990
- Smith v. KingWashington Supreme Court · 1986
- Group Health Cooperative of Puget Sound, Inc. v. Department of RevenueWashington Supreme Court · 1986
- Stender v. Twin City Foods, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1973
- J. W. Seavey Hop Corp. v. PollockWashington Supreme Court · 1944
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Hearst Communications v. Seattle Times Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2005
- Hearst Communications, Inc. v. Seattle Times Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2005
- Denny's Restaurants, Inc. v. Security Union Title InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1993
- BNC Mortgage, Inc. v. Tax Pros, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2002
- BNC Mortgage, Inc. v. Tax Pros, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2002
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.