Legal Opinion

Hart v. Stribling

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided June 15, 1889PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval county. The facts of the case are stated in the opinion of the court. Judge McClellan, of the First Circuit, sat in the place of Raney, C. J., disqualified.

1Opinion of the Court

Mitchell, J.:

O. B. Hart was the guardian of Mary E. Hart, now Stribling, and Moody and Baldwin were the sureties on Plart’s bond as such guardian.

Hart obtained orders, under the statute, to sell real estate of his ward, and was required to,give additional bonds to secure the ward for moneys which might come to his possession under said orders of sales, and C. L. Robinson, H. H. Hovy and Ozias Buddington became sureties for Hart on the additional bonds.

The sales were made and considerable sums of money arising therefrom went into the hands of the guardian. The ward attained her majority August…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Rohrbach v. . Germania Fire Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1875
  2. Supervisors v. KennicottSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  3. Fellows v. PrentissCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1846
  4. Clark v. KeithSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  5. McLemore v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1827

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. McKinnon v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1909
  2. Fidelity & Deposit Co. v. L. Bucki & Son Lumber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1903
  3. L. Bucki & Son Lumber Co. v. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of MarylandCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1901
  4. Josephson v. SweetDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1964
  5. Tampa Waterworks Co. v. City of TampaUnited States Circuit Court for the Southern District of Florida · 1903

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API