Legal Opinion

Tampa Waterworks Co. v. City of Tampa

United States Circuit Court for the Southern District of Florida

Decided July 15, 1903PublishedCited by 5 opinions

In Equity. Heard on motion for injunction pendente lite.

1Opinion of the Court

PARDEE, Circuit Judge.

The bill charges that a certain ordinance of the city of Tampa, passed under authority of the laws of the state of Florida, prescribing maximum rates that the complainant waterworks company may charge for water furnished the city and citizens of Tampa, is unreasonably low, and, if put in force and operation as threatened, will be confiscatory of the complainant’s property, and will be a taking of complainant’s property without due process of law, in violation of the Constitution of the United States. The facts stated in the bill and affidavits submitted show a decided…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. STANTON v. Embrey, AdministratorSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Clark v. Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  3. Great Western Telegraph Co. v. BurnhamSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  4. State ex rel. Reynolds v. WhiteSupreme Court of Florida · 1898
  5. Doyle v. WadeSupreme Court of Florida · 1887

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Estate of Nye v. First National BankIndiana Court of Appeals · 1973
  2. Coppedge v. ClintonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1934
  3. In re Beach Resort Hotel Corp.District Court, S.D. Florida · 1956
  4. Norris Grain Co. v. Transworld Foods, Inc. (In Re Transworld Foods, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · 1984
  5. Estate of Nye v. First National BankIndiana Court of Appeals · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API