Legal Opinion

J.B. Pease v. Ken Klinger Attorney General of the State of Oklahoma

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided June 5, 1997No. 96-6341PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Per curiam

J.B. Pease appeals from the district court’s September 26, 1996 order adopting the magistrate judge’s findings and recommendation and dismissing his third 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas petition. The magistrate judge recommended dismissal based on the Antiter-rorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 (“AEDPA”), finding that Mr. Pease failed to obtain prior authorization from this court before filing his third petition in the district court. See 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(3)(A); Hatch v. State of Okl., 92 F.3d 1012, 1013 (10th Cir.1996). Mr. Pease then filed a notice of appeal rather than an…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Rafael Nunez v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
  2. Hatch v. State of OklahomaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. United States v. BarrettCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
  2. Spitznas v. BooneCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
  3. Angelo Torres v. Daniel Senkowski, SuperintendentCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
  4. United States v. TorresCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
  5. United States v. HarperCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API