Legal Opinion
(PC) Reyes v. Valley State Prison
District Court, E.D. California
Decided July 12, 2021No. 1:20-cv-00023Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JOSE REYES, 1:20-cv-00023-DAD-GSA-PC 12 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, RECOMMENDING THAT THIS CASE 13 vs. PROCEED AGAINST DEFENDANTS FISHER, PAEZ, ANGUIANO, CHAPAS, LUCERO, 14 VALLEY STATE PRISON, et al., MARQUEZ, CRUZ, AND MOOSEBAUR FOR VIOLATION OF RLUIPA, VIOLATION OF 15 Defendants. FIRST AMENDMENT FREE EXERCISE CLAUSE, AND ADVERSE CONDITIONS OF 16 CONFINEMENT; AGAINST DEFENDANTS FISHER AND MOOSEBAUR FOR FAILURE TO 17 PROTECT PLAINTIFF FROM CONTAMINATED FOODS; AND AGAINST 18 DEFENDANT MOOSEBAUR…
2Cases cited51 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Hudson v. McMillianSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- J. Wilkerson v. B. WheelerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.