Legal Opinion

Postal Telegraph Cable Co. v. County of Los Angeles

California Supreme Court

Decided June 5, 1911No. L.A. No. 2559PublishedCited by 7 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior- Court of Los Angeles County. Frederick W. Houser, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtAngellotti, J.

This like the action of Western Union Tel. Co. v. County of Los Angeles, (L. A. No. 2446), ante, p. 124, [116 Pac. 564], is an action to recover taxes paid by plaintiff under protest for the fiscal year ending June 30,1907, upon an assessment upon its “right to occupy the streets of the city of Los Angeles,” the assessment valuation being thirty thousand dollars, and the tax thereon $330. Plaintiff had judgment and defendant appeals from such judgment.

There is no material difference between this case and the Western Union Telegraph Company case just referred to. This plaintiff, a telegraph…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Davies v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Banaz v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Western Union Telegraph Co. v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. County of Los Angeles v. Southern California Telephone Co.California Supreme Court · 1948
  2. City of Petaluma v. Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co.California Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Postal Telegraph-Cable Co. v. Railroad CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Postal Telegraph-Cable Co. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  5. County of Los Angeles v. Southern California Telephone Co.California Supreme Court · 1948

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API