State v. Fuller
Supreme Court of Louisiana
1Opinion of the CourtSt. Paul, J.
The defendant was convicted of having carnal knowledge of an unmarried female under the age of 18 years, with her consent. Act 192 of 1912. His appeal presents fifteen bills of exception;
Bills Nos. .1 and 2 relate to the refusal of the trial judge to permit defendant, after pleading not guilty, to withdraw his said-plea and file a motion to quash the indictment on the ground that Act 192 of 1912 does not define any crime, the words “carnal' knowledge” having no fixed and certain meaning.
Leave to withdraw a plea of not guilty to afford opportunity to file a motion to-quash the indictment rests…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- State v. FosterSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1922
- State v. HollingsworthSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1925
- State v. VialSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1923
- State v. PoseySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1924
- State v. HutchinsonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1927
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. MooreSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1973
- State v. LabatSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1954
- State v. AclieseSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1981
- State v. RogersSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1961
- State v. HillsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1971
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.