Legal Opinion
United States v. Robert Denoia
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided November 1, 1971No. 3, 54, 55, Dockets 71-1032, 71-1145, 71-1175PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Per curiam
The only issue on appeal in this routine narcotics case which warrants brief mention is the sufficiency of the evidence connecting appellants to the conspiracy.
Appellants DeNoia, Jacovino and Scor-zello appeal from judgments of conviction entered upon a jury verdict after a three day trial in the District Court for the Southern District of New York, Lloyd F. MacMahon, District Judge, finding them guilty on one count of concealing, transporting and selling heroin, in violation of the federal narcotics laws, 21 U.S.C. §§ 173 and 174 (1964), 1 and on one count of conspiring to violate the same…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. William BentvenaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963
- United States v. AgueciCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
- United States v. Ralph 'Whitey' Tropiano, Lawrence R. Pellegrino and William Grasso,defendants-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969
- United States v. StrombergCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1959
- United States v. AvilesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1960
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- United States v. Carmine TramuntiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
- United States v. Joseph C. Gallo Frederick Graewe Hartmut Graewe, Kevin Joseph McTaggart Angelo A. LonardoCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985
- United States v. Herbert SperlingCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
- United States v. Dale Murray, Paul Leahey, Ronald Vanderbosch, Lawrence Tower, and Linton SherlockCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
- United States v. Mohammad Dawood NusratyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.