Legal Opinion

People v. Tucker

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided May 27, 2008No. 1-06-2816PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Wolfson

This case concerns a constitutional right so highly valued that harmless error analysis will not be applied to its violation. We refer to a criminal defendant’s right to retained counsel of his choice.

Defendant Larry Tucker was convicted by a jury of two counts of criminal sexual assault. He was sentenced to two consecutive four-year terms in prison.

The main issue on appeal is whether the trial court abused its discretion in denying defendant’s motion for a continuance to substitute counsel after a brief inquiry about the circumstances of the request. Defendant also contends the trial court…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Wheat v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. United States v. Gonzalez-LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  3. The PEOPLE v. GreenIllinois Supreme Court · 1969
  4. People v. BaslerIllinois Supreme Court · 2000
  5. People v. WashingtonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1990

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. People v. BaezIllinois Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Arroyo v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2013
  3. People v. AdamsAppellate Court of Illinois · 2016
  4. People v. BriscoAppellate Court of Illinois · 2012
  5. People v. JenkinsAppellate Court of Illinois · 2020

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API