People v. Tucker
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Wolfson
This case concerns a constitutional right so highly valued that harmless error analysis will not be applied to its violation. We refer to a criminal defendant’s right to retained counsel of his choice.
Defendant Larry Tucker was convicted by a jury of two counts of criminal sexual assault. He was sentenced to two consecutive four-year terms in prison.
The main issue on appeal is whether the trial court abused its discretion in denying defendant’s motion for a continuance to substitute counsel after a brief inquiry about the circumstances of the request. Defendant also contends the trial court…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Wheat v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- United States v. Gonzalez-LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- The PEOPLE v. GreenIllinois Supreme Court · 1969
- People v. BaslerIllinois Supreme Court · 2000
- People v. WashingtonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1990
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- People v. BaezIllinois Supreme Court · 2011
- Arroyo v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2013
- People v. AdamsAppellate Court of Illinois · 2016
- People v. BriscoAppellate Court of Illinois · 2012
- People v. JenkinsAppellate Court of Illinois · 2020
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.