Legal Opinion
Kinnon v. Arcoub, Gopman & Associates, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided June 29, 2007No. 06-14020PublishedCited by 61 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BIRCH, Circuit Judge:
At issue before us is the application of 42 U.S.C. § 1981 to a claim for discrimination arising out of a verbal contract for the delivery of food. Plaintiff-appellant Valerie Kinnon appeals from the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Defendant-appellee Judith Gopman. Kin-non contends that she was subject to racially motivated discrimination at the hands of Gopman, in the form of excessive delivery changes and tardy delivery, and racist, threatening telephone calls from Gopman after Kinnon refused delivery of the food. The district court granted summary…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Sandra Jackson v. BellSouth TelecommunicationsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
- Domino's Pizza, Inc. v. McDonaldSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Merritt v. Dillard Paper CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997
- Hampton v. Dillard Department Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by61 opinions
- Cook v. Randolph County, Ga.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2009
- Jimenez v. Wellstar Health SystemCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2010
- Oliver v. Coca Cola Co.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2007
- Rami Ziyadat v. Diamondrock Hospitality CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2021
- Lopez v. Target Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2012
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.