Legal Opinion

Tootle v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided April 13, 1932No. 9269-9274PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STONE, Circuit Judge.

These are petitions to review redeterminations of the income taxes of petitioners for 1926. Each petitioner was a common stockholder in the Aunt Jemima Mills Company (a Delaware corporation), and the controversy, in each case, is whether a dividend paid in 1925 is to be treated as an ordinary or as a dividend in course of liquidation. The taxpayers included it in their return as an ordinary dividend. The commissioner and the Board of Tax Appeals determined it to be a partial dividend in a liquidation and, as such, taxable under section 201 (c) of tbe Revenue Act of 1926…

2Cited by15 opinions

  1. Hugh H. Earle, Former Collector of Internal Revenue v. Angela MacEvoy WoodlawCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957
  2. Kennemer v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1938
  3. Helvering v. Edison Securities CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1935
  4. Rheinstrom v. ConnerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1942
  5. Holmby Corporation v. Commissioner of Internal Rev.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1936

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API