Legal Opinion
Rheinstrom v. Conner
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided February 13, 1942No. 8850, 8851PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McAllister, circuit judge.
These cases were heard separately before the court, without a jury, but, because they arise out of the same facts, were disposed of in the same findings, and are presented on the same record on review.
On appellants’ suits claiming refund of income taxes claimed to have been erroneously assessed, the District Court entered judgments in favor of the Collector of Internal Revenue.
In 1908, the Karl Kiefer Machine Company was organized as an Ohio corporation, with authorized capital of $500,000.00, consisting of 3,000 shares of common stock, with a par value of $100.00…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Eisner v. MacOmberSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Helvering v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Eisner, Internal Revenue Collector v. MacOmberSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Edwards v. DouglasSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Flanagan v. HelveringCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1940
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Hugh H. Earle, Former Collector of Internal Revenue v. Angela MacEvoy WoodlawCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957
- Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. RobertsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1953
- Kerr v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1962
- H. C. Jones, Individually and as a Former Collector of Internal Revenue v. John Toole GriffinCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1954
- Idaho Power Company v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1958
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.