Legal Opinion

United States Filter Corp. v. Ionics, Inc.

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided October 8, 1999No. CIV. A. 98-10541-REKPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KEETON, District Judge.

I. Pending Matters

Pending for decision, after a three-day evidentiary hearing on September 14, 15, and 16, 1999, are the following motions:(1) Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment of Invalidity of the Patent In Suit (Docket No. 92, filed December 21, 1998) with supporting memoranda (Docket Nos. 98, 121, 129, 146, 153, 180, 211). Plaintiffs have filed numerous oppositions and replies (Docket Nos. 100,110, 111, 125, 150, 201).(2) At the beginning and at the end of a three-day evidentiary hearing on September 14, 15, and 16, 1999, plaintiffs moved for Partial…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
  4. Vitronics Corporation v. Conceptronic, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
  5. Dickinson v. ZurkoSupreme Court of the United States · 1999

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Pro-Football, Inc. v. HarjoDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2003
  2. MBO LABORATORIES, INC. v. Becton, Dickinson & Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
  3. Silicon Storage Technology, Inc. v. Xicor LLCDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API