Legal Opinion

Perry v. A.W. Chesterton, Inc.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided December 4, 2013No. MDL No. 875; Civil Action No. 2:95-cv-01996-ERPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

EDUARDO C. ROBRENO, District Judge.

I. BACKGROUND

Before the Court is the Rule 12(b)(6) Motion to Dismiss of Defendant Railroad *671Friction Products Corporation (“Defendant” or “RFPC”).

Plaintiff Alice Perry, as administratrix and in her own right, (“Plaintiff’ or “Mrs. Perry”), asserts that her husband (“Decedent” or “Mr. Perry”) developed asbestos-related injuries while installing and removing RFPC brake shoes located on various types of railcars. RFPC argues that Plaintiffs complaint should be dismissed because her claims are preempted by the Locomotive Inspection Act (“LIA”), 49…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation v. White Consolidated Industries, Inc., C/o Ct Corporation Systems Registered AgentCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
  5. Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1992

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In Re Asbestos Products Liability Litigation (No. VI)Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2016
  2. Estate of Sandra Brust and Philip Brust, Etc. v. AcfNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2015
  3. Hassell v. Budd Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2019
  4. SHIELDS v. GENERAL ELECTRIC CO.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API