Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Bessie Kirksey v. Iris Johnson

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided October 17, 2014No. 1130385 and 1130403Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partMoore, Chief Justice

(concurring in the result in case no. 1130385 and dissenting in case no. 1130403).

I concur with the conclusion of the main opinion that the probate court lacked subject-matter jurisdiction to oversee the wrongful-death settlement and the distribution of the settlement proceeds. However, I concur in the result in case no. 1130385 and dissent in case no. 1130403 because, pursuant to § 12-22-20, Ala.Code 1975, I believe both cases are properly before us on appeal from a “final decree of the probate court, or from any final judgment, order or decree of the probate judge.” In my opinion, the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bernals, Inc. v. Kessler-Greystone, LLCSupreme Court of Alabama · 2011
  2. Doby v. CarrollSupreme Court of Alabama · 1962
  3. McDonald v. LyleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1960
  4. Watts v. Town of Green ValleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1968
  5. Pynes v. Jackson HospitalSupreme Court of Alabama · 2012

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API