Legal Opinion
Ginn v. Kelley Pontiac-Mazda, Inc.
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Decided January 6, 2004PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLevy, J.
[¶ 1] Kelley Pontiac-Mazda, Inc., appeals from a judgment entered by the Superior Court (Penobscot County, Hjelm, J.) in favor of Vance Ginn on Ginn’s complaint alleging unlawful employment discrimination in violation of the Maine Whis-tleblowers’ Protection Act, 26 M.R.S.A. §§ 831-840 (1988 & Supp.2003). Kelley argues that the court (1) abused its discretion by including the value of Ginn’s use of an employer-provided vehicle to commute to and from work in the calculation of its award of back pay, and (2) erred in concluding that Kelley failed to establish that Ginn did not mitigate his…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Albemarle Paper Co. v. MoodySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Maine Human Rights Commission v. City of AuburnSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
- Maine Human Rights Commission Ex Rel. Kellman v. Department of CorrectionsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1984
- Rozanski v. A-P-A Transport, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1986
- Jacobson v. Pitman-Moore, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1984
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Flint A. Hutchinson v. Christina A. BruyereSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2015
- Levitt v. Sonardyne, Inc.District Court, D. Maine · 2013
- Burr v. JordanSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2008