Legal Opinion

Hiegel Farms Corp. v. Casselman

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided June 1, 1984No. 83-463PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHastings, J.

The plaintiff, Hiegel Farms Corporation, appeals the dismissal of its petition to obtain an injunction to remove an embankment which is alleged to obstruct the natural flow of surface waters. The district court determined that although both the plaintiff’s and defendants’ lands are within a watershed area, there is no natural depression, draw, swale, or watercourse upon either of the premises.

The trial court also found that the accumulation of floodwaters from the land of the plaintiff was caused primarily by a low spot in the southeast corner of the plaintiff’s land, and additionally by the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Nichol v. YocumNebraska Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Grint v. HartNebraska Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Eunice Harrington Investments, Ltd. v. WallaceNebraska Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Kluck v. MentzerNebraska Supreme Court · 1984

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Lanphier v. Omaha Public Power DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Shotkoski v. PrososkiNebraska Supreme Court · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API