Legal Opinion

Kevin Razzoli v. T.Q.L. Logistics, et al.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided December 15, 2025No. 1:25-cv-06307Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK — — DATE FILED: 12/15/2025 KEVIN RAZZOLI, Plaintiff, REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ~ 25-CV-6307 (LJL) (HJR) T.Q.L. LOGISTICS, et al., Defendants. HENRY J. RICARDO, United States Magistrate Judge. On August 16, 2025, plaintiff Kevin Razzoli (“Plaintiff”) filed a motion under Rule 64 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (“Rule 64”) seeking “Seizure of Property to Insure Payment,” ECF No. 8 (the “Motion”), and a supporting brief, ECF No. 9 (the “Brief’). For the reasons described below, the undersigned respectfully RECOMMENDS that…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Wagner & Wagner, LLP v. Atkinson, Haskins, Nellis, Brittingham, Gladd & Carwile, P.C.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
  3. Buy This, Inc. v. MCI Worldcom Communications, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2001
  4. Asdourian v. KonstantinDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API