Post Pub. Co. v. Schickling
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtHamilton, J.
Joseph Schickling, by his father as next friend, brought an action in the Hamilton Common Pleas against the Post Publishing Co. claiming damages for personal injuries as a result of being struck by an automobile driven by Wm. Meader, who was delivering papers for the Company.
The Company claimed that the relation of master and servant did not exist and that it would not be liable under the doctrine of respondeat superior; and that Meader was an independent contractor and liable for his own acts while engaged in its service.
It seems that Meader was employed in another manner from 6:00 A. M. to…
2Cited by11 opinions
- Skidmore Ex Rel. Skidmore v. HaggardSupreme Court of Missouri · 1937
- Greening v. Gazette Printing Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1939
- Fulton v. AszmanOhio Court of Appeals · 1982
- Clark v. SheaOregon Supreme Court · 1929
- Plost v. Avondale Motor Car Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1935
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.