Legal Opinion
United States v. Escandar
District Court, S.D. Florida
Decided November 3, 1970No. 70-333-CrPublishedCited by 65 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
MEHRTENS, District Judge.
Defendants entered pleas of nolo contendere to various charges herein, reserving the right to move to suppress evidence seized as a result of interceptions made on the home telephone of defendant Mario Escandar (379-2042) and on the pay telephone located in the lobby of the apartment building where Escandar resided (374-8809).
In accordance with an order of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida dated May 21, 1970, an interception of wire communications was authorized on the telephone number 379-2042 for a…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Alderman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Marron v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by65 opinions
- United States v. Arthur TortorelloCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
- United States v. CoxCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1972
- United States v. Pasquale Falcone Appeal of Pasquale Falconio in No. 73-2013. Appeal of Wally Berger in No. 73-2109Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
- Commonwealth v. VitelloMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
- United States v. Eddie David CoxCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1971
60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.