Legal Opinion

Harris v. Biomet Orthopedics LLC

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided November 18, 2019No. 1:18-cv-03924Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND JOHN HARRIS, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. ELH-18-3924 BIOMET ORTHOPEDICS, LLC, et al., Defendants. STEPHEN HARBOLD, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. ELH-18-3925 v. BIOMET ORTHOPEDICS, LLC, et al., Defendants. SIDNEY KANDEL, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. ELH-18-3864 BIOMET ORTHOPEDICS, LLC, et al., Defendants. PAULETTE RINGLEY, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. ELH-17-747 v. BIOMET INC., et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION These product liability cases are rooted in an allegedly defective orthopedic device used for hip replacements.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Francis v. FranklinSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Opper v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  3. Philip Morris USA v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Richard Arnold, IV v. Eastern Air Lines, Inc. v. United States of America, Francis C. Mihalek v. Eastern Air Lines, Inc. v. United States of America, Helen Rae Weston, as of the Estate of Lewis M. Weston, Deceased v. Eastern Air Lines, Inc., the Aetna Casualty and Surety Company Aetna Insurance Company American Empire Insurance Company Commercial Union Insurance Company Compagnies D'AssurAnces Du Groupe Concorde Continental Casualty Company Employers Mutual Liability Insurance Company of Wisconsin Hartford Fire Insurance Company Industrial Indemnity Company Maryland Casualty Company Reliance Insurance Company Royal Indemnity Company St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company Security Insurance Company of Hartford the Travelers Indemnity Company Underwriters at Lloyd's and Associated British Insurance Companies United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company United States Fire Insurance Company Zurich Insurance Company v. United States of America Bernard C. Groseclose Alden E. Hare William L. Hogan Dennis L. HunterCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1982
  5. Amal Eghnayem v. Boston Scientific CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2017

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API