Jones v. Shoji
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
WELLS, Judge.
We note initially that the appellant has failed to comply with Rule 10 of the North Carolina Rules of Appellate Procedure. While appellant properly excepted to a large number of the court’s findings of fact and the resulting conclusions of law and also correctly referenced the assigned errors to the excepted findings, it failed to direct this Court to specific findings it challenges, instead arguing the general denial of its claim for contribution and indemnification. Concrete Service Corp. v. Investors Group, Inc., 79 N.C. App. 678, 340 S.E.2d 755, cert. denied, 317 N.C. 333,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Concrete Service Corp. v. Investors Group, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
- Pike v. Wachovia Bank and Trust CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- Potter v. Homestead Preservation Ass'nSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1992
- Concrete Service Corp. v. Investors Group, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
- Rushing v. PolkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Jones v. ShojiSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994
- Lake Colony Construction, Inc. v. BoydCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
- Dt Lulana Gardens LLC v. Sdck I LLCNorth Carolina Business Court · 2026
- Lucas v. HopperNorth Carolina Business Court · 2026
- Lucas v. HopperNorth Carolina Business Court · 2026
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.