State v. Salzman

The defendant was, by an information containing two counts, charged with the crime of grand larceny, in that he bought and received the property described in each count, knowing it to have been stolen. From judgment entered upon a verdict of guilty on both counts, defendant appeals.

Appellant makes six assignments of error, three of which challenge the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the verdict. The other assignments are directed to the giving of an instruction and the refusal to give two instructions requested by appellant.

First: At the close of the state’s case, appellant moved to…