Legal Opinion

In re Van Orden

New York Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 1900PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Application on habeas corpus to be discharged from imprisonment.

1Opinion of the CourtMcAdam, J.

The criminal complaint before the magistrate certainly charges the prisoner with the crime of forgery. Penal Code, § 511. It alleges that the prisoner did “ willfully and feloniously ” make, forge and utter a certain check upon the Liberty National Bank for twelve dollars and twenty-five cents, made payable to the order of Murray & Sullivan, and the indorsement of Murray & Sullivan, in that defendant did forge the name of Murray & Sullivan upon the back of said check without any lawful right or authority so to do, and without the knowledge or consent of Murray & Sullivan, of which firm the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. . WimanNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
  2. Purdy v. PetersNew York Supreme Court · 1862

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. PsarasWashington Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Thompson v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API