People v. . Wiman
New York Court of Appeals
Appeal from a judgment of the general term of the supreme <30urt, reversing the conviction of defendant.
1Per curiam
It appears that Robert G. Dun, Arthur J. King, Robert D. Douglass, and the defendant, Erastus Wiman, were associated together in business, carrying on a mercantile agencies under the names of R. G. Dun & Co., and Dun, Wiman & Co., in various cities of the United States and Canada. Wiman was the principal business manager, and had the power to sign the company’s name to checks that were necessary to be drawn in the conduct of the business. On the 6th day of February, 1893, the company was owing one E. W. Bullinger the sum of about $15,-600, and on that day the defendant directed a clerk in the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Stokes v. . People of the State of N.Y.New York Court of Appeals · 1873
- People v. . FlackNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
- People of the State of N.Y. v. . PowellNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
- Duffy v. . the PeopleNew York Court of Appeals · 1863
3Cited by13 opinions
- People Ex Rel. Hegeman v. . CorriganNew York Court of Appeals · 1909
- World Exchange Bank v. Commercial Casualty InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
- United States Ex Rel. Jelic v. District Director of Immigration & Naturalization, Ellis IslandCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1939
- People v. . WeaverNew York Court of Appeals · 1904
- People v. DuncanNew York Court of Appeals · 1963
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.