Legal Opinion

Parker, Clerk v. State ex rel. Powell

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided October 12, 1892No. , 16,731PublishedCited by 18 opinions

From the Henry Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtMcBride, C. J.

— The Attorney General moves to dismiss this appeal, on the ground that the suit is fictitious and collusive. All the parties to the original litigation have filed affidavits and answers, resisting the motion, denying collusion and asserting that the controversy is real. The appellee also files a motion to strike out the motion of the Attorney General to dismiss, and to vacate the order permitting his appearance.

We find nothing in the record, or in the showing made by the Attorney General, sufficient to authorize a dismissal. The complaint questions the validity of two acts of the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Board of Commissioners v. NewmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1870

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Estado Libre Asociado v. AguayoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1958
  2. Price v. Sixth District Agricultural Assn.California Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Golden Gate Bridge & Highway District v. FeltCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  4. State ex rel. Geake v. FoxIndiana Supreme Court · 1902
  5. County of San Bernardino v. Harsh California Corp.California Supreme Court · 1959

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API